We keep it intentionally open as long as we have not completed the consortium formation.Minutes from concal 21 Nov 2011:0) The next concal
will take place in 2 weeks, same time. All of the attendees would accept this date of 5 Dec 2011, 4-6 pm. I'll send you the invitation within the next days.1) Papers
All potential authors as listed in the papers have confirmed to write the full papers, even as more elaborated version of around 20 pages.
We are already discussing with some of our colleagues in this round, how we should publish these papers, ideas welcome.
The teams of the papers should team up themselves ASAP and come with an outline to the next concal, so we could decide who would contribute what to a paper and in which extent, perhaps similar to the first extended abstract http://www.citt-online.de/downloads/3-D ... Etzion.pdf
We discussed the overview doc of open and future calls. Nobody has additional suggestions for opportunities so far.
Everybody will send - within the next 2 weeks - his/her opinion of
2.1) which workprogramme and which topic(s) we should join
2.2) as IP and/or STREP3) Potential coordinator
- must be decided until submission for pre-check.
- should be a well known organisation/person in the field(s) of BioMedCEP
- with a history and good experience of contributing to EC work programmes and working with EC units
- should know the head(s) of units personally and could call/contact them directly
- should know the internal Brussels EC procedures and routines, preassessment situation, hearing...
- ideally should have been a member of an Advisory Group of a work programme or a Topic/Challenge
3.1) Scientific and financial management: may be one or separate roles
3.2) (industrial) Big Dog needed? as coordinator (Andrea Gaggioli suggested Siemens)? (see FAQ's of EC websites, seems it's not a MUST anymore to include Big Dogs at all, we discussed the problems of Big Dogs with patents and with contributing to EU projects at all, etc., see also our discussion in the past viewtopic.php?f=13&t=295
3.3) Experienced university (necessary as coordinator in the case of an IP?)
3.4) Most topics must be SME led (as you can see from my doc of open and future calls), SME must not, but can take the coordinator role and this would then be an extra-plus. EC has changed policies to strengthen the role and motivation of innovative SME's, as it seems - at least at some of the units/topics.
Must be discussed with the EC unit which we would like to select for the proposal.4) Presentation of ideas at the next concal
Andreas Schuppert (RWTH Aachen) will give a presentation of the idea "Disease modelling, bio-markers and virtual physiology ..." and will send an outline.5) Japan Shonan BioMedCEP seminar
Because I got mail from colleague who would like to join, problems are:
- We would have a strong subject for such a seminar with BioMedCEP. But we would have to motivate around 20 or more people.
- Deadline for the submission is already 15 Dec 2011. The enthusiasm was not so big on Monday;-) or it came too suddenly of course.
But we should keep it in our minds, perhaps we submit the same idea some months later.
- We'll summarize all your ideas before the next concal, so everybody can attend concretely prepared.
Please send your ideas, elaboration and your special "customization" of a draft skeleton of a workpackages structure (see below), in order to get a "feeling" how it could look like and who could contribute to which work package. And perhaps we can already discuss the criteria how to write a good proposal http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/fet-pro ... -04_en.pdf
(although this is not a guarantee, as the most of you know;-))Draft skeleton of a workpackages structure
Titel: -tbd -
WP2: Definition of a BioMedCEP reference model and reference architecture
2.1 Brain Computer Interfaces - from and to the brain
2.1.1 from the brain
2.1.2 to the brain
2.2 Wearable Technologies, Body Area Networks
2.3 Bio-sensors, Event Adapters, communication approaches for living cells
2.4 Exocortex approaches, event processing, mapping complex events to the brain, U-CEP engines
2.5 Enhancing sensitivity ranges of humans
2.6 Adding additional senses to humans
WP3: Modelling notations and execution languages
3.1 Evaluation of existing modelling notations and standards
3.2 Evaluation of existing execution languages
3.3 Standardizing of modelling notations and execution languages
3.4 Domain-specific reference models and architectures for event patterns (as NEAx)
WP4: Definition of bio-sensors and bio-markers for diseases, definition of treatments/processes regarding influencing the protein machinery and the metabolism
4.1 Depression or burn out
4.4 Ageing, longevity, quality of life...
WP5: Implementation and installation of Labs, Exploitation
5.1 BrainPort and CN-NINM
5.2 Wearable Technologies, Body Area Networks
5.3 Bio-seonsors, Event Adapters, communication approaches for living cells
5.4 Exocortex approaches, event processing, mapping complex events to the brain, U-CEP engines
5.5 Enhancing sensitivity ranges of humans
5.6 Adding additional senses to humans
Download as ppt: http://www.citt-online.com/downloads/WP ... eleton.ppt
Feel free to change and send back email@example.com